Back to Daft Choices

Field note 001

This Made Sense Locally

Many bad outcomes are not caused by stupidity. They are caused by rational decisions made inside badly shaped systems.

The local decision

Someone shortens a process, tightens a target, adds an approval step, or automates a judgement call. In the immediate setting, the choice looks tidy. It saves time, protects a budget, reduces noise, or gives a manager something concrete to track.

The wider consequence

The improvement travels badly. A metric that made one team sharper makes another team cautious. A control that removed one mistake creates three delays. A small automation reduces effort at the front desk and moves the hard part to the person trying to appeal it.

The hidden incentive

The system rewards what can be counted, defended, or completed inside one person's patch. It rarely rewards the slower work of noticing where the cost has gone. So the local answer keeps winning, even while the whole arrangement gets stranger.

The pattern to watch for

Watch for decisions that are easy to justify in isolation and hard to explain end to end. The clue is often a sentence like: "That is not our part of the process."

Questions worth asking

  • What does this decision make easier, and for whom?
  • Where does the inconvenience move?
  • Which behaviour will people learn from the new rule, metric, or tool?
  • Who can still see the whole situation after the change?

Comment carefully

Send examples or corrections by email. Responses are private by default and manually reviewed before anything is quoted. Respond to this note.